Difference between revisions of "IGVC"
m |
m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Category:IGVC]] | [[Category:IGVC]] | ||
[[File:Jessi.jpg|thumb|right|400px|Our 2018 robot, Jessi]] | [[File:Jessi.jpg|thumb|right|400px|Our 2018 robot, Jessi]] | ||
| − | The IGVC competition is centered around building the next generation of off road, all weather autonomous vehicles. The idea is to create a vehicle and tech stack that can navigate through an obstacle course to given GPS waypoints without human intervention. The map is not known beforehand and while there are certain obstacles that are common anything can be placed onto the course. The competition is scored in three main areas. First is the design of the robot as presented in the TDP (a written report on the vehicle) that is given to industry experts for judging. Next the team is scored based on their presentation of their robot. Finally the robot is put to the test by trying to navigate the fastest route on the AutoNav course. '''''If''''' (sometimes no one completes the course) multiple robots complete the course the winner is the fastest time, otherwise the robot that navigates the farthest is the winner. In other words speed is second to safety. | + | The IGVC competition is centered around building the next generation of off road, all weather autonomous vehicles. The idea is to create a vehicle and tech stack that can navigate through an obstacle course to given GPS waypoints without human intervention. The map is not known beforehand and while there are certain obstacles that are common anything can be placed onto the course. The competition is scored in three main areas. First is the design of the robot as presented in the TDP (a written report on the vehicle) that is given to industry experts for judging. Next the team is scored based on their presentation of their robot. Finally the robot is put to the test by trying to navigate the fastest route on the AutoNav course. '''''If''''' (sometimes no one completes the course) multiple robots complete the course the winner is the fastest time, otherwise the robot that navigates the farthest is the winner. In other words speed is second to safety. |
<noinclude> | <noinclude> | ||
{{countdown | {{countdown | ||
Revision as of 11:31, 29 June 2018
The IGVC competition is centered around building the next generation of off road, all weather autonomous vehicles. The idea is to create a vehicle and tech stack that can navigate through an obstacle course to given GPS waypoints without human intervention. The map is not known beforehand and while there are certain obstacles that are common anything can be placed onto the course. The competition is scored in three main areas. First is the design of the robot as presented in the TDP (a written report on the vehicle) that is given to industry experts for judging. Next the team is scored based on their presentation of their robot. Finally the robot is put to the test by trying to navigate the fastest route on the AutoNav course. If (sometimes no one completes the course) multiple robots complete the course the winner is the fastest time, otherwise the robot that navigates the farthest is the winner. In other words speed is second to safety.
Did we win?
Meetings
We meet in the Student Competition Center (575 14th St). If you are working in the machine shop or mechanical room you will need to wear closed-toe shoes and a t-shirt (no long sleeves). Bring a hair tie if needed.
- Wednesdays 6:30PM to 9PM
- Sundays 4PM to 7PM
Leadership
- Project Manager: Dallas Downing
- Electrical Lead: Ryan Waldheim
- Mechanical Lead: Young Won
- Software Lead: Andrew Tuttle
Competition
Guidelines
Important Dates
- June 8-13 (estimated)
Subteam Resources
Electrical
- Overview
- Training info
Mechanical
- Overview
- Training info
Software
- Overview
- Training info
Past Competitions
Past IGVC Competitions should be summarized here, like the BattleBots main page.
2018 Jessi
2017 Jaymi Woodi
2016 Jaymi Mistii
2015 Mistii
2014 Mistii
2013 Misti
2012 Roxii
2011 Roxii
2010 Jeanni
2009 Candiii
2008 Candii
- Design Report: RTENOTITLE
2007 Candi
- Design Report: File:TrixxieDesignReport.pdf
2006 Trixxie
- Design Report: File:TrixxieDesignReport.pdf
2005 No Robot
RoboJackets lacked the man power in order to send a team during this year of transition.
2004 Buzzbot II
- Design Report: File:BuzzBotIIDesignReport.pdf
2003 Buzzbot
- Design Report: File:BuzzBotDesignReport.pdf
