Difference between revisions of "Robocup 2018 Fleet"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Mwoodward6 (talk | contribs) m (Change tense of word) |
|||
Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
* Consider other radio options | * Consider other radio options | ||
* Rebuild capture play to enable passing | * Rebuild capture play to enable passing | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[Category: RoboCup]] |
Latest revision as of 18:47, 22 May 2020
Robocup 2018 Robot | |
---|---|
Contents
Competitions
Robocup 2018
- Results
- Loss vs. Neu Islanders
- Tie vs. ULtron
- Win vs. AMC
- Tie vs. RoboIME
- Win vs. RoboFEI
- Loss vs. UBC Thunderbots
Good aspects from competition
- Wheels rolled pretty consistently and did not slip on the carpet terribly often
- Kicks were very consistent, and the kicker did not break
- Shell design was user-friendly, and robust
- Batteries were extremely long lasting
- Control boards were extremely robust
Issues at competition
- Lack of chipper made strategy much harder
- Dribbler material was not appropriate
- Using foam is not acceptable compared to a plastic or rubber material
- The dampening aspect of the dribbler is not as important as the grippiness for the dribbler roller
- MBed is incapable of doing enough floating point calculations to process IMU inputs for motion control
- The Decawave radios cut out when the referee walks in between them
- Capture did not work
Changes/Improvements for 2019 Fleet
- Develop a chipper to facilitate starts
- Add damping to the dribbler to facilitate passing
- Build upon the usability of the previous shell, and make it semi-permanent
- Build upon the wheels to make a smoother ride
- Create a custom version of the MBed based on the Cortex-M7
- Consider other radio options
- Rebuild capture play to enable passing