Difference between revisions of "RoboCup Mechanical 2015"

From RoboJackets Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 9: Line 9:
 
<font size="2">The team has taken part in RoboCup every year since 2008*. Two different fleets of robots are used: a fleet designed in 2008, and a fleet designed in 2011. The 2008 fleet sports a solenoid powered kicker mechanism and a fixed dribbler. The 2011 fleet sports solenoid powered kicker AND chipper mechanisms, along with a fixed dribbler and encoders on the motors. However, due to an error in the manufacturing of the 2011 fleet, the drivetrain of these robots have suffered tremendously, resulting in decayed performance of the motors. This renders mostly all 2011 robots functionally incapable. Thus, the most reliable robots have been those designed in 2008. Without encoders, however, this presents significant challenges to our software team.</font>
 
<font size="2">The team has taken part in RoboCup every year since 2008*. Two different fleets of robots are used: a fleet designed in 2008, and a fleet designed in 2011. The 2008 fleet sports a solenoid powered kicker mechanism and a fixed dribbler. The 2011 fleet sports solenoid powered kicker AND chipper mechanisms, along with a fixed dribbler and encoders on the motors. However, due to an error in the manufacturing of the 2011 fleet, the drivetrain of these robots have suffered tremendously, resulting in decayed performance of the motors. This renders mostly all 2011 robots functionally incapable. Thus, the most reliable robots have been those designed in 2008. Without encoders, however, this presents significant challenges to our software team.</font>
  
<font size="2">Due to these challenges, it has been determined that a complete rebuild of the robots is required to continue to be competitive in the RoboCup SSL.</font>
+
<font size="2">Due to these challenges, it has been determined that a complete rebuild of the robots is required to continue to be competitive in the RoboCup SSL. Particular emphasis is being placed on designing passive mechanisms that aid the software team in having finer control over the robots and the ball.</font>
  
 
== <span style="line-height: 20.7999992370605px">Requirements</span> ==
 
== <span style="line-height: 20.7999992370605px">Requirements</span> ==

Revision as of 10:18, 21 December 2014

This page houses the 2015 RoboCup Mechanical efforts. Mechanical tasks for the 2015 competition year can be most easily summarized as a complete redesign of the SSL fleet. 

Mechanical team meets Tuesday, 6-9pm Sunday, 1-5pm. More hours will be announced as deadlines approach.

http://wiki.robojackets.org/mediawiki/images/5/51/RC2008DevRender.jpg

Background

The team has taken part in RoboCup every year since 2008*. Two different fleets of robots are used: a fleet designed in 2008, and a fleet designed in 2011. The 2008 fleet sports a solenoid powered kicker mechanism and a fixed dribbler. The 2011 fleet sports solenoid powered kicker AND chipper mechanisms, along with a fixed dribbler and encoders on the motors. However, due to an error in the manufacturing of the 2011 fleet, the drivetrain of these robots have suffered tremendously, resulting in decayed performance of the motors. This renders mostly all 2011 robots functionally incapable. Thus, the most reliable robots have been those designed in 2008. Without encoders, however, this presents significant challenges to our software team.

Due to these challenges, it has been determined that a complete rebuild of the robots is required to continue to be competitive in the RoboCup SSL. Particular emphasis is being placed on designing passive mechanisms that aid the software team in having finer control over the robots and the ball.

Requirements

Primary Goals

The team for the 2015 competition year has met several times to discuss the primary goals for a new fleet of robots. These requirements are outlined below, in order of highest priority to lowest priority.

1) Encoders on the motors

2) Robust drivetrain mounts

3) Damped dribbler

4) Lower profile solenoids

5) Superior traction/grip for the wheels

6) Robust shell design

Secondary Goals

The team has also considered other desired characteristics of the robots that are not necessarily competition-oriented goals. The list is below (in no particular order).

1) Improved tolerances for the omniwheel (previous designs have significant play in this subsystem)

2) Improved aesthetics for the robot shell

3) Ease of attachment/removal of electrical boards

Systems

System Components and Bill of Materials

Drivetrain

Omni Wheels
Motors/Gearing
Drive Module

Integration

Shell
Chassis

Ball Control

Dribbler
:Kicker
:Chipper
:Ball Sensor

Testing

Test Rig

Schedule

  • Finalize a prototype by the end of January (shortly after the arrival of the new 50W Maxon Motors
  • Manufacture a fleet by the end of February

Specifications

  • maximum robot weight - 1.8 kg
    *ball speed after being kicked - 10 m/s
    *dribbler bar speed - 8000 rpm
    *compress time (time for dribbler to absorb ball's energy and compress) - .2 seconds
    *no more than 20% of the ball's area (seen from top view) may be occupied by the robot - a critical Robocup SSL Rule
    **see http://wiki.robojackets.org/mediawiki/images/c/c8/Ball_sketch.PNG

Meetings

Attendance information is logged on paper for every meeting and submitted to the College of Computing for record-keeping.

Documentation

Testing

RoboCup Testing

Quick Notes

  • field area 5 meters x 3.5 meters
    *max ball speed - 10 m/s
    *ball diameter - 43 mm
    *ball mass - 46 grams
    *1 rpm = .105 rad/s
    *ball material - DuPont Surlyn Ionomer Dupont's Surlyn Page
    *coefficient of static friction of golf ball on felt carpet - .66
    **last two points from Cornell 2003 Mechanical Documentation

Prototype Notes

  • make drive module shaft out of stronger material to prevent bending
    *ground clearance needs to be increased to prevent the robot from rubbing on the carpet
    *4mm holes on the dribbler assembly need to changed to .177" - clearance hole for a 8-32 screw - ease of assembly, prevent burring of the dribbler shafts
    *binding of the drive modules can be reduced by adjusting the position of the motor, using the tolerance of its mounting screws
    *design plastic guide block so hole for chipper hinge is centered
    *dribbler motor plate needs to be wider and flush to the motor
    *M2x4mm screws need to be ordered for the dribbler motor
    *consider increasing diameter of dribbler roller to add strength to the piece

Useful Links

[[Category:RoboCup]]<br/>[[Category:Mechanical]]<br/>[[Category:Year: 2007-2008|Year:_2007-2008]]